<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: question on earthquake in california?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthquakequestions.com/question-on-earthquake-in-california.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthquakequestions.com/question-on-earthquake-in-california.htm</link>
	<description>Everything You Want To Know About Earthquakes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigger</title>
		<link>http://earthquakequestions.com/question-on-earthquake-in-california.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10271</link>
		<dc:creator>tigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthquakequestions.com/question-on-earthquake-in-california.htm#comment-10271</guid>
		<description>The last article I read about a month ago, showed predictions for California for the next 30 years. According to the new computer programs, there is a &quot;higher&quot; probability of a larger magnitude earthquake in southern California. The study I read, and cannot seam to find now, mentioned the individual faults and the percent of chance for each fault having a large quake. The highest percent was somewhere around 20% for the san andreas fault that goes through Los Angeles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last article I read about a month ago, showed predictions for California for the next 30 years. According to the new computer programs, there is a &quot;higher&quot; probability of a larger magnitude earthquake in southern California. The study I read, and cannot seam to find now, mentioned the individual faults and the percent of chance for each fault having a large quake. The highest percent was somewhere around 20% for the san andreas fault that goes through Los Angeles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mama Bear</title>
		<link>http://earthquakequestions.com/question-on-earthquake-in-california.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10272</link>
		<dc:creator>Mama Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthquakequestions.com/question-on-earthquake-in-california.htm#comment-10272</guid>
		<description>If those are the same people who said that half of California would slide into the ocean before 1985, don&#039;t hold your breath.
It can and may happen, but there is no way to predict when something will fall or start to fail, it isn&#039;t like cloud formations or low pressure fronts.
It probably just goes by seismic activity (underground vibrations) which come and go all the time everywhere in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If those are the same people who said that half of California would slide into the ocean before 1985, don&#8217;t hold your breath.<br />
It can and may happen, but there is no way to predict when something will fall or start to fail, it isn&#8217;t like cloud formations or low pressure fronts.<br />
It probably just goes by seismic activity (underground vibrations) which come and go all the time everywhere in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

