<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earthquake hitting California in the next 10 years?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthquakequestions.com/earthquake-hitting-california-in-the-next-10-years.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthquakequestions.com/earthquake-hitting-california-in-the-next-10-years.htm</link>
	<description>Everything You Want To Know About Earthquakes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here, Kitteh Kitteh</title>
		<link>http://earthquakequestions.com/earthquake-hitting-california-in-the-next-10-years.htm/comment-page-1#comment-13347</link>
		<dc:creator>Here, Kitteh Kitteh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthquakequestions.com/earthquake-hitting-california-in-the-next-10-years.htm#comment-13347</guid>
		<description>The faults there are not likely to be able to generate that much energy under any situation. Geologists are unsure if any existing fault anywhere could generate anything over a 10, That much energy likely requires a bolide impact (like a comet).

The scale earthquakes are measured on is logarithmic, so that means an earthquake of the size you are talking about would have about 700 or 800 times the energy (and destructive power) that the recent great quake in Chile had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The faults there are not likely to be able to generate that much energy under any situation. Geologists are unsure if any existing fault anywhere could generate anything over a 10, That much energy likely requires a bolide impact (like a comet).</p>
<p>The scale earthquakes are measured on is logarithmic, so that means an earthquake of the size you are talking about would have about 700 or 800 times the energy (and destructive power) that the recent great quake in Chile had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton...</title>
		<link>http://earthquakequestions.com/earthquake-hitting-california-in-the-next-10-years.htm/comment-page-1#comment-13348</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthquakequestions.com/earthquake-hitting-california-in-the-next-10-years.htm#comment-13348</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a load of bull...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a load of bull&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meanolmaw</title>
		<link>http://earthquakequestions.com/earthquake-hitting-california-in-the-next-10-years.htm/comment-page-1#comment-13349</link>
		<dc:creator>meanolmaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthquakequestions.com/earthquake-hitting-california-in-the-next-10-years.htm#comment-13349</guid>
		<description>actually, from what I&#039;ve been reading, the earthquake that is expected to hit the US is one located closer to Washington state.... off the coast... another subduction area.... possibly in the next 50 yrs... you must expect that with the pressure being relieved elsewhere, that something else is going to want to move a little, too..... like that one....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, from what I&#8217;ve been reading, the earthquake that is expected to hit the US is one located closer to Washington state&#8230;. off the coast&#8230; another subduction area&#8230;. possibly in the next 50 yrs&#8230; you must expect that with the pressure being relieved elsewhere, that something else is going to want to move a little, too&#8230;.. like that one&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

